Jump to content

Talk:LIO (SCSI target)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:LIO Target)

Conflict of interest

[edit]

This article about a product from RisingTide Systems appears to be soaking in WP:COI. It was created by Thomas.uhl (talk · contribs) who appears to be RisingTide's VP of Business Development; and its most prolific editor is Marcfl (talk · contribs), who appears to be its CEO. The latter in particular has a history of using Wikipedia as a vehicle for promoting both himself (see WP:Articles for deletion/Marc Fleischmann) and his company (see WP:Articles for deletion/RisingTide). TJRC (talk) 01:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. This might be notable enough to keep, but the peacock language needs to come down a bit to be more neutral, as per independent sources W Nowicki (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Requested move 23 May 2014

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to LIO (SCSI target). The consensus is that this isn't the primary topic of LIO and no one has opposed to Dsimic's proposal of "LIO (SCSI target)". I would say there's consensus to move Lio to Lio (singer) except that no notice has been left at that article and it's unreasonable to move an article when anyone watching that page would have had no idea it was even under discussion. If anyone feels strongly about it (pinging In ictu oculi), I'd suggest starting a new RM at Talk:Lio. Jenks24 (talk) 14:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



LIO TargetLIO – In Linux commonly just referred to as "LIO". – Marcfl (talk) 16:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on LIO (SCSI target). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the architecture section

[edit]

This whole article is a bit of a dumpster fire that's the architecture section blatantly violates WP:NPOV. I propose that we clean it up or if it's too far gone we just remove it until we can get it better 22FatCats (talk) 16:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review new changes

[edit]

I have made some changes to the summary of the article (see my edit on 21 oct 2024). Since these are some of my first edits to Wikipedia, it would be helpful if my changes could be reviewed, and ideally, some feedback provided. MrCiteYourSources (talk) 13:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]