Talk:LGBTQ/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:LGBT/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Intro
[edit]Hello! I'm weebiloobil (talk · contribs), and I'll be your GA-reviewer. For reference during this process, you can see the criteria here. The review should be completed in 7 days, probably sooner. Feel free to drop me a line if you have any questions. Thanks, and good luck! - weebiloobil (talk) 21:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- The review will be here tomorrow - weebiloobil (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
The Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Hmm
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Seems a bit full of references to overload the prose, but this does not hinder the article
- B. MoS compliance:
- One occurance of 'meanwhile', which is a word to avoid. Otherwise, this article is fine MoS-wise. I think
- Removed. -- Banjeboi 01:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- One occurance of 'meanwhile', which is a word to avoid. Otherwise, this article is fine MoS-wise. I think
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Oh, yes
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- I doubt it could be referenced any more
- C. No original research:
- Perhaps a teensy-weensy bit - what the hell are 'growing pains'?
- Clarified. -- Banjeboi 01:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps a teensy-weensy bit - what the hell are 'growing pains'?
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- It is just an initialism, after all; well done for wringing an article out of it
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Just about. It almost tips the scales at some points, such as '"Queer" has many negative connotations to older people who remember the word as a taunt and insult, a usage of the term that has continued.', seemingly rejecting Queer as a viable alternative, but this does not really come through
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No recent edit wars that I can see
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Uh-oh. See here. This article is having a bit of a problem with images at the moment. Please look into it. I have left comments regarding this review on the images' deletion page.
- Images switched out. -- Banjeboi 01:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Uh-oh. See here. This article is having a bit of a problem with images at the moment. Please look into it. I have left comments regarding this review on the images' deletion page.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- At the moment, but could change - see above
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Ordinarily, because this article has image problems, I would have to fail this article. However, I am awaiting the result of the deletion request, and so this article is now on an indefinite hold - feel free to edit it according to the other problems as noted above. Thank you - weebiloobil (talk) 20:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think I've addressed all the concerns - thank you for looking into this. -- Banjeboi 01:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ordinarily, because this article has image problems, I would have to fail this article. However, I am awaiting the result of the deletion request, and so this article is now on an indefinite hold - feel free to edit it according to the other problems as noted above. Thank you - weebiloobil (talk) 20:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Well done - I have now passed this article. Celebrations all round! - weebiloobil (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.