Talk:Leisure (band)

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 February 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand music task force.

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed deletion notice- this band is being confused with an irrelevant one of the same name, an article about whom was deleted in 2006. This is about the popular New Zealand band with over a million monthly listeners on Spotify.

CONFUSION- THIS ARTICLE IS NOT ABOUT THE BAND OF THE SAME NAME FROM SOUTHHAMPTON. IT HAS BEEN TAGGED FOR DELETION DUE TO THE OTHER BAND HAVING THEIR ARTICLE DELETED FIFTEEN YEARS AGO. --Aubernas (talk) 09:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

curprev 11:37, 27 January 2021‎ @Aubernas: talk contribs‎ 2,747 bytes +2,747‎ Made a page for LEISURE, who have over 1 million monthly listeners on Spotify, but bizarrely, no Wikipedia page.

Requested move 30 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to Leisure (band) (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LEISURE (band) → LEISURE – There are no other articles named LEISURE (in all caps) on Wikipedia. Leisure as a concept is far more notable than this band but there is no danger of name collision as one name is written in all caps and the other is not. JIP | Talk 17:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per the WP:MOSTM this should be at Leisure (band) unless independent sources use the stylization in question. So far no evidence has been provided that they do and in fact the one independent source currently provided uses leisure.--65.92.160.124 (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Leisure (band) if not an all caps name in independent sources otherwise support as unnecessary disambiguation. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, per Born2cycle support as proposed as 1st choice otherwise move to lowercase. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose obviously Move to Leisure (band) was going to say "Delete and salt until notable to prevent recreation". but maybe this Jul 31, 2019 https://www.metromag.co.nz/arts/arts-music/leisure-nz-music-auckland-metro article can be supplemented with other sources? @JIP: do you have any other sources? And note that the one source which exists says Leisure (band) not caps. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Shouldn't this be at "Leisure (band)" per capitalisation rules? HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It should be unless it’s demonstrated that a significant number of reliable sources regularly use the capitalized stylization but so far the evidence is learning in the opposite direction.--65.92.160.124 (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per usage in almost every source I can find; they’re using LEISURE. Variance Sniffers Clash Music Happy Mag NME.com Nettwerk —В²C ☎ 12:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with citing the stylisms on these promotion-piece websites is that context makes clear it is a (band), which ELEPHANT, ZODIAC, SODASTREAM doesn't. Don't get me wrong I want to frustrate and misdirect readers as much as the next editor and make Wikipedia a giant article-content guessing game, but here 3rd party sources are using "Leisure (band)". In ictu oculi (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The source cited in the article uses "Leisure", and so does the band's own website, on this page in the merch descriptions. Move to Leisure (band) instead. —ShelfSkewed Talk 14:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Leisure (band) per MOS:TM, WP:TITLETM, MOS:ALLCAPS and ShelfSkewed. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Leisure (band) Wikipedia titles are always in sentence case, even if name of a band stylized all caps (like StayC). [ Talk to me ] Show! Music Core and more favorite 09:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Notability

This article is definitely worth keeping, and expanding greatly (including full pages about their albums and extended plays, with images of the covers. LEISURE have 1.4 million monthly listeners on Spotify, far more than a few dozen other bands who have wikipedia pages that I can think of on the top of my head. The fact there was no Wikipedia page for them until now is just completely daft, and I created this one because I was tired of people complaining to me that LEISURE didn't have a Wikipedia page at all, let alone any recognition of what has become one of New Zealand's most internationally successful groups. Deleting this page would be utterly crazy and set an upsetting precedent for New Zealand's music recognition on the internet. I am determined to see this page grow and develop. --Aubernas (talk) 10:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]