Talk:Korean decimal classification

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The KDC seems awfully similar to the Dewey Decimal Classification system. Maybe its a (slight) variant. In that case would it help to merge this article into the larger and well-developed one.Bless sins (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Korean decimal classification be renamed and moved to Korean Decimal Classification.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Korean decimal classification → Korean Decimal Classification – bringing the title in line with titles of similar classification systems and with the usage within the article itself Literally Satan (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 2409:408C:1398:B1E2:0:0:2984:58A4 (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Raladic (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Someone already executed this move. Perhaps that should be reverted until the discussion is completed. Note that there was a move in the opposite direction at 07:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC) by Tony1, so this is potentially controversial. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Classification have been capitalized without change or any proposals for change since they were created in 2001. Just because some of the words are descriptive doesn't mean it is not the proper name of a system. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – n-gram stats show that it's at least 1/3 lowercase in sources, far from "consistently capitalized", so defaulting to lowercase per MOS:CAPS make sense. Dicklyon (talk) 02:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative oppose for now. Need to provide evidence of consistently capitalized or proper name of system. What other similar seeming titles do doesn't strongly matter. seefooddiet (talk) 05:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]