Talk:Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Epilepsy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Epilepsy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of epilepsy and epileptic seizures on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EpilepsyWikipedia:WikiProject EpilepsyTemplate:WikiProject EpilepsyEpilepsy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Genetics / Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

note

Quality of Information: 2
Article size: 2
Readability: 2 *Gets pretty technical in Gene Mutations sections, consider adding in sentences so layperson can read it.
Refs: 2
Links: 2
Responsive to comments: 2 *No comments on page yet.
Formatting: 1 *Change the types of brain imaging (MRI and EEG) to be subsections of Brain Imaging
Writing: 1 *There were sections in the draft from November 18 with weird wording - the Related Gene Mutations specifically.
Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
Outstanding?: 2

Article was extremely interesting and well-written, there was no added media (pics, videos) so consider adding in for the final Wikipedia article. _______________ Total: 18 out of 20 Reviewed by KelseyGratton (talk) 21:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 1, I think you could add more links to other wikipedia pages to direct readers to more detailed explanations.
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 2, some grammatical errors but I like that you added short explanations to a word that could be confusing or unknown to readers.
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 2, Pictures would be a nice addition! And do you know anything about the prognosis of this syndrome?
_______________ Total: 19 out of 20
AshleyHardy (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of Information: 2
Article size: 2 (~15,300)
Readability: 2
Refs: 2 (several recent articles linked)
Links: 1

There are some other wikipedia links used; however, I think if more pages were linked, the reader would better understand the article.

Responsive to comments: 1

Been over 5 days since first review and no response.

Formatting: 2 (followed wikipedia formatting)
Writing: 1

Just make sure to proofread. One heading is messed up (Splice-Site Muation) and there are other minor grammatical errors.

Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
Outstanding?: 1

Once it is proofread and more links are added, you will be golden!

Total: 16 out of 20 Allison gainer (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I made some final edits (spelling and grammar fixes and some coding adjustments with headings) as well as adding some clarification along with more linked pages. Let me know if you see anything else. Kathleen Heller (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]