Talk:Know It All Ed/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 18:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plot: Maybe link turkey basters, quirt guns, and cul-de-sac
- Done. --Khanassassin ☪ 15:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plot: Who is Double D?
- Explained now (first use in Plot section). :) --Khanassassin ☪ 15:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plot: What is "make-do"? Maybe its just a certain type of expression I'm not familiar with. Does it mean "make-shift"? Just want to check
- Yeah, pretty much.
Plot: "A tied-up Johnny crawls out…" Why is he tied up?
- Obviously by "something evil" (Kankers).
Plot: If Lee Kanker already snatched the jar from Eddy's hands, it should follow that at least one of the sisters is already there. THus, the sentence "The Kanker Sisters, also the outlaws who plagued Jonny and Plank, arrive" should either be changed to "The rest of the Kanker Sisters, also the outlaws who plagued Jonny and Plank, arrive", or something similar.
- Yesss. --Khanassassin ☪ 15:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plot: "where are a battle between the Eds and the Kankers." Incomplete sentence… does the battle start? Finish? Explode? :P
- Fixed, lol. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 15:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plot: "but when the Kankers stop firing, Eddy is happy to see that the Kankers only hit their feet". This sentence doesn't make a ton of sense; if the Kankers stopped firing, they why do they hit their feet? The first part implies the action stopped, but the second part implies the action kept going. This should be patched up.
- Does the newly-added "had" explain that this is a past action? --Khanassassin ☪ 15:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Production: The part in this section about the episode premiering should probably be the lead-in sentence for the "Reception" section.
I worry that the skimpiness of the "Production" and "Reception" section may pose a problem. As it stands, I couldn't find any more reviews for the episode, and not a single more shred of production info. You might be able to add the line "Antonucci stated that change in the characters from the first to the second season is "very" noticeable, due to the amount of development they've went through." from the season 2 page in the section "Production and cast" (furthermore, does the cited featurette have any info that you could add)?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The big change over/character and background changes part was actually referring to the second season's beginning compared to the last season's overall style, so I guess that could be squeezed in, but not anything else really. --Khanassassin ☪ 15:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I made a few more changes and I'll pass it now. Be warned that the shortness of the reception or production section could pose problems if you want to promote this article further, though. It's good for a GA, though.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks! But no, GA is the highest rank this article can be promoted to, most likely, so it's cool. --Khanassassin ☪ 17:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]