Talk:Kiki Kaikai/GAN
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:KiKi KaiKai/GAN)
GA review
[edit]Good article nomination on hold
[edit]This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of July 16, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Yes, although the Story should be presented ahead of the Gameplay section, it would read a lot better and makes more sense to discuss the plot before details of hidden items, number matches etc are presented.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Appears to be accurate enough.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Yes.
- 5. Article stability? Stable.
- 6. Images?: All tagged correctly.
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — The Rambling Man 07:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, that template is a bit harsh isn't it?! Anyway, I'll re-review accordingly now you've made the requested changes. All the best... The Rambling Man 16:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]The results of my re-review are as follows:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
Good work to all involved. The Rambling Man 16:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Great, thanks Rambling Man! Nall 18:43, 16 July 2007