Talk:Kentico Xperience
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Past debate
[edit] | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
POV
[edit]This article reads like an advertisement for the company, probably written or copy-pasted by one of its employees, and it needs to be edited to conform to a NPOV. As such, I've added the POV tag to the page. Here are some actionable items: Facts like the 12,000 web pages are used to make it sound like everyone's using Kentico, but it's really a fairly small community. CMS like Drupal are powering literally millions of websites, and that perspective is lost. That's the kind of thing where the bias comes in. Also, there is no perspective on possible drawbacks, such as having a small CMS community or few 3rd party plugins, etc. The dumped list of features is also fairly unencyclopedic. --12.131.165.2 (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Adoption/Reception
[edit]It would be good to know something about Kentico's usage.
Generally it doesn't seem especially popular, although it may have more substantial popularity in specific uses, such as (perhaps) on the .com.au domain.
See What CMS: Kentico.
—DIV (1.129.107.47 (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC))
Cleaning up the page
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- Specific text to be added or removed: Remove both Modules and Features sections
- Reason for the change: List of features or modules is based on a version of the software and gets outdated fast. Right now it is not accurate already so the information is not valuable. It is also easy to find elsewhere.
- References supporting change: Official feature list is missing some[1]
- COI disclosure: I am employed by the Kentico company
Ondrejhenek (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Already done by someone else. casualdejekyll 02:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please, oh please, someone at the firm or elsewhere find something notable to write about this software / firm. Ed1964 (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Specific text to be added or removed: Remove the "\{\{Undisclosed paid|date=November 2021\}\}"
- Reason for the change: The article was cleaned already and the request above is finishing the work.
- References supporting change: See article history of previous cleanups
- COI disclosure: I am employed by the Kentico company
Ondrejhenek (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Already done by someone else. casualdejekyll 02:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
References