Talk:Kathleen Deignan
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]I do not believe that this person is notable enough to deserve an article, so therefore am proposing deletion. Contramein 23:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- This person is one of the few female spiritual music composers. Wikipedia has entries for many men, but no women in this genre. In addition, her work on Thomas Merton and on east-west spiritually is notable. Please leave this page, her students, the college, the religious community she belongs too and the publishing nonprofit, Schola Ministries, are all working on the page.Sfterry 01:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- From the various international articles on this musician I feel that she is more than notable enough.--Theosony (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.
As a result, I attempted to remove the unsourced material and restore the article to a NPOV. Romanus Natus (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)