Talk:Karman cannula

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removing un-cited comments

The last section of this article is an opinion, not fact:

"Although Karman aspiration is generally accepted as a "safe" method of surgical evacuation of the uterus, it is as dangerous as other sharp or steel gynecological surgical instruments at untrained hands. The surgical termination of pregnancy should be considered a serious intervention where bleeding, uterine and other vital organ perforations, serious pain and shock are -although rare - probable and serious complications."

This paragraph either needs to cite a reputable source or be taken down. As far as I know this method is used by many physicians and is considered quite safe. Is there a doctor or scientific source that can be quoted saying it is as dangerous as other sharp instruments? I also don't think any physician would accept the statement that "serious pain and shock are...probable and serious complications." While serious, these complications are not probable.

Lknelson3 (talk) 23:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was BOLD and removed the comment. Lknelson3 (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]