Jump to content

Talk:Kamikaze (1937 aircraft)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Kamikaze (aircraft))

THanks you

[edit]

Hi, I Just wrote the French version of this article. I started with English version but I finally changed everything. Since it's not a translation anymore I didn't credit the authors from this article but I'd still like to thank you for getting me interested in Kamikaze plane.

Regards

--LJouvenaux (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kamikaze (aircraft). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 August 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Kamikaze (1937 aircraft). (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 16:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kamikaze (aircraft)Kamikaze (airplane) – The article is currently called Kamikaze (aircraft). Since "aircraft" can be a plural as well as a singular term, this provides little disambiguation from the Kamikaze attacks. I suggest retitling it to Kamikaze (airplane), which is clearly a singular. 174.89.49.204 (talk) 22:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC) --174.89.49.204 (talk) 22:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sceptical of need and thus Oppose. Anyone who is actually looking for this specific plane will quickly realise the Kamikaze article is not what they were looking for. There is a link to the Kamikaze (disambiguation) page at the top of that other article and there they will quickly find the link to this article. And if you look at another famous Japanese long distance record setting plane, the Nippon you will find that article also uses '(aircraft)'. So I think we should be consistent. Finally 'airplane' is US English where the equivalent word in UK English is 'aeroplane'. But the word 'aircraft' is used in both dialects. Oska (talk) 00:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. No disambiguation at all, given aircraft and airplane mean exactly the same thing (except that one is North American English and the other is universal English). A possibility would be Kamikaze (1937 aircraft), which already redirects here and was the article title until moved without discussion in 2015. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would support the move back to Kamikaze (1937 aircraft). Perhaps we can find consensus this way. Oska (talk) 06:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kamikaze (1937 aircraft) makes sense to me as well. Retswerb (talk) 04:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.