Talk:Kalapuya

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Protected

Thank you for protecting this page from the many anonymous IPs that were vandalizing it. I personally reccomend unblocking it in just a day or two. To those reading this, if that much time has passed, please consider requesting it being unblocked if it hasn't. Erich Blume 19:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I think a day should be ok. If I don't remember to unprotect, please leave a message on my talk page. - Aksi_great (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have unprotected the page now. I don't think the vandals would return. I have the page watchlisted to protect in case they return. - Aksi_great (talk) 08:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it was a pack of bored schoolkids from Eugene. A quick look at the WHOIS on all the IPs I warned didn't turn up an abuse reporting address for Eugene School District 4J, but if they come back, that is an option... Katr67 14:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

The information that was copied from the duplicate article needs to be merged with the rest of the article. This could also use some headings and perhaps unlinking some of the bands that may just end up becoming redirects to this article. (Unless they are in some way notable enough to merit a separate article). And of course this badly needs to have citations. Katr67 21:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up needed

Chemeketa and Chemawa bands in Salem area. See Chemawa. Katr67 (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The word "Shaman" is not a Native word. It is a European word and thus, no one in the Kalapuya Tribe was ever called a "shaman" as listed in the wiki.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kalapuya people → Kalapuya
Kalapuya → Kalapuya (disambiguation)

– "Kalapuya" was the original title here - actually "Calapooya" was, created on July 1, 2004 (I can't determine when "Calapooya" was changed to Kalapuya, but note that Kalapooian was merged in e.g. here. Over seven years later from its origins, the ethno article was moved from "Kalapuya" to "Kalapuya people" by Kwami on Oct 2 2011, over redirect and without discussion or any reason given. As now established by consensus across a large series of RMs of this kind lately, the people are the PRIMARYTOPIC in such cases per PRECISION and CONCISENESS. To underscore this here are the view stats:

"Kalapuya people" was viewed 988 times in 201403
"Kalapuya language" was viewed 62 times in 201403
"Kalapuya (fungus)" was viewed 19 times in 201403 Skookum1 (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Kalapuya Treaty", which was not on the dab page but a title I spotted on early edits to the ethno article, was viewed 23 times in 201403; I will add it to the dab page, which will prevent that from being a TWODABS page once the ethno article is moved, per PRECISION, CONCISENESS and PRIMARYTOPIC, to the standalone title.Skookum1 (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just discovered that Kalapuya Treaty is a redirect to [[1]]. View stats for that are 169 views in 201403.Skookum1 (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nominator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeBayWeather (talk • contribs) 16:53, 17 April 2014‎

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kalapuya/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Good start but really only stub. Needs expansion/revision, map --Skookum1 (10 May 06)

Also needs a good deal of cleanup and formatting and such. --Miskwito 23:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 20:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kalapuya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]