Jump to content

Talk:Kaiser-class ironclad/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Add armor to infobox. Details of armament as rebuilt.
    I'd prefer to keep the figures for the ships as built; the two ships were rearmed differently and I don't want to make the infobox too long. Armor added. Parsecboy (talk) 20:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, then how about some general info in the main body as to what their main guns became?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    The 21cm guns were removed, and the info on the new battery is already in the armament section. Parsecboy (talk) 10:50, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Explain L/20, link boiler, battery, torpedo tube, torpedo. Wooden or iron decks?
    Should all be added, except the last one. Groner doesn't say, but I'd assume teak decks. Parsecboy (talk) 20:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: