Talk:Kaiping Tramway and Imperial Railways of North China

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 24, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

China: Transportation High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Transportation in China task force (assessed as High-importance).

Moved Kinder info

To his own article. This one could use a few lines on him but mostly a coda on the railway between the end of the Russo-Japanese War and the complete nationalization and reorganization of all lines in 1949. (Although it might have stayed gov't-owned throughout, since it apparently paid for the Communications Clique and their lot.) — LlywelynII 04:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that seems broken

I have just glanced at that and don't understand it all yet, but the separate Kinder article seems badly disconnected from the Kinder information in this article. The two need to come together.

Dashwood Poyntz Ricketts

Is this the same railway, and yet anopther chief engineer?

The London Gazette of 16 March 1926 notes that The King has been pleased to give and grant unto Dash Poyntz Ricketts, Esq., Engineer-in-chief Peking-Mukden Railway, His Majesty's Royal Licence and authority to wear the insignia of the Fourth Class of the Order of the Excellent Crop, which decoration has been conferred upon him by the President of the Republic of China in recognition of valuable services rendered by him.

Emrys2 (talk) 10:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaiping Tramway and Imperial Railways of North China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070614043821/http://www.hkrs.org.hk/newsletter/thrutrain/tt9809/ewoosung.htm to http://www.hkrs.org.hk/newsletter/thrutrain/tt9809/ewoosung.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion for split

This is an editor that usually work in Chinese WP. Having read some essays, Chorographies, and reports from Chinese Railway Co. nowadays, I am now clear of the timeline of Peking-Mukden Railway, and come up with some ideas:

The contents related to the company "Imperial Chinese Railways (ICR)" should be moved to a new article to elaborate on the development of this company;
The contents related to the construction and service of the tramway should be separated in several phases:
- Sections west (inside) of the (Shanhai)Pass:
  - Tangshan - Xugezhuang tramway (1881)→Tangshan - Lutai Tramway (1887)→Tangshan - Tanggu - Tianjin Railway (1888)→;
  - Guye - Tianjin Railway (1890)→;
  - Tianjin - Yuguan (nowadays Shanhai Pass) Railway (1894);
  - When the first-built Kaiping Tramway extended to Yuguan and Tianjin, the Railway from Lugouqiao to Tianjin was completed in 1897;
- Sections east (outside) of the Pass:
  - From Shanhai Pass to Suizhong (1891-1894)
  - extension to Dahushan (1895-1900)
  - extension to Xinmin (1900-1904)
  - extension to Mukden (1904-1912)
- In 1907, the Peking - Mukden Railway Administration, affiliated to the Ministry of Posts and Communications, was set up and the Railway from Peking to Shanhai Pass was renamed as "Peking - Mukden Railway".

After listing the outline, I suggest that the history, from the Plan of Kaiping Tramway to the extension to Tianjin, can be regarded as a complete phase (from proposition to extension) and kept in this article, while the extension to Shanhai Pass should be moved to a new article called "Peking - Mukden Railway", under a section called "the construction of the inside-of-the-pass section"; similarly, the extensions to Mukden should be moved to article "Peking - Mukden Railway" under a section called "the construction of the outside-of-the-pass section".

PS: The Peking-Mukden Railway was split in 1932 into 2 sections: the section inside the pass and that outside of the pass, since the Manchukuo, under the support of Japanese Invaders, controlled the section outside of the pass and renamed it as "Mukden-Shanhai Pass Railway"; at the same time, the the section inside of the pass was renamed as "Peiping-Shanhai Pass Railway".

These are the ideas I have.

Johnson.Xia (talk) 03:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Peking-Mukden Railway appears ready for acceptance. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't agree with splitting this page into two articles. The Kaiping Tramway and Imperial Railways of North China are too closely related. Without dirts having the Kaping "Tramway" this line would not have become the Kaiping railway, then China Railway and later Imperial Railways of North China . ( submitted by Wikipedia's "Chinarail" ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinarail (talk • contribs) 06:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

I have accepted it. DGG ( talk ) 22:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC) �

They are closely related, but they are basically 2 things. Johnson.Xia (talk) 22:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

@Chinarail:Kaiping Tramway was Industrial railway under Kaiping Mines, while Peking–Mukden Railway was a national trunk line, so they should be separate.--Johnson.Xia (talk) 04:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]