Talk:Kaidai-type submarine

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Japan: Military history C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:10, December 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Need info checked

According to this I-174 was sunk 12 April by enemy aircraft, not 3 April in an "accident". Which account is correct? Drutt (talk) 06:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BU

"Raised and BU in 1942" This sentence appears (with no explanation), in the 'Kaichi IV class' section - the I-61 entry. Clicking on it brings you to a dis page where the closest statement seems to be: "bu, a Japanese unit for measuring length equivalent to 3.03 millimetres" (note the lower case 'bu'). As that is unlikely to be the correct definition, is there anyone out there who knows what "BU" means?

RASAM (talk) 19:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BU = Broken up. Dr. Loosmark 19:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for the prompt answer to my query; you would think that in the interest of clarity "Broken Up" could have been used in the first place. Would you like to do the honours and edit sccordingly?

RASAM (talk) 20:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I73 is listed as being sunk on two different days by two different groups of ships. I understand about disputed claims. (The total aircraft claimed shot down was for instance about 3 times the number of planes in the air.) As listing for Gudgeon gives it as sinking this sub but listings for the other ships do not I suspect the first entry is correct especially as 2nd ref gives sinking far from convoy it attacked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.255.2 (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]