Jump to content

Talk:KTX-Sancheon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:KTX-II)
Former good article nomineeKTX-Sancheon was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 30, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

Details to find

[edit]

I am almost certain that the unsourced dimensions given in the Korean Wikipedia are rounded to 100 mm. However, I found more precise sources only for the non-extreme intermediate cars, and one for the power cars. But I am not sure I can trust the last one: the length given is identical to the HSR-350x's, despite the different front design; and the height is identical to that of the KTX-I, despite the slightly decreased height of the HSR-350x relative to the KTX-I. For now the Infobox uses this data and assumes that the extreme intermediate cars continue to keep to the TGV dimensions.

Another info to find: maximum speed achieved in tests. A user who uploaded a video on several sites claims 384 km/h, but I couldn't find another source for the claim, and it's close enough to be a corrupted reference to the planned but never realised HSR-350x test speed of 385 km/h. (Also, the design speed, which is pretty much what you are supposed to barely surpass in tests, is 330 km/h.) --Rontombontom (talk) 00:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:KTX-II/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    fails lead. Lead should be at least three concise paragraphs, summerising the article.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Since half the references are in Korean I'm going to have to assume good faith.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

When did Korea start its high speed project

Already before HSR-350x was finished Should be before then HSR

Links to techie words or explaination needed. Should have links all over the place here to be fair. Hardly any techie words explained

only pressure isolation as in the KTX-I. Need was requiered or something at the end

The view that shorter trains have to be added to the KTX rolling stock for operational flexibility was reinforced by the actual Honam KTX seat occupation trends after the launch of KTX services on April 1, 2004 with the 20-car KTX-I trains. Stupidly long sentence and seems to be quiet a bit of POV within it.m rephrasing needed.

In October 2005, however, Korail called competitive bids. Who. This has not been explained nor is the oraginsation/person linked, they haven't been mentioned before

Hyundai Rotem also offered the KTX-II in the competition to supply rolling stock for Brazil's Rio–São Paulo project.[22]. Merge can't have one sentence paragraph

After a naming competition held in the next ten days,. Over the next 10 days

Since the first reviewer was indef-blocked, I'll review this and will post my comments shortly. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the issues above which haven't been resolved,, I found these issues:

  • "To increase the domestic added value," of? that's a bit confusing as written
  • "the carbody of intermediate cars is made of aluminum" it could probably just say "the body of.."
  • All refs in Korean need to be noted as such. Many are but some are not.

As a result of the findings combined with it being a week without work done, I am failing the article as a GA. It can be re-nominated when all issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on KTX-Sancheon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on KTX-Sancheon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]