Talk:KITE (Kansas City)

A fact from KITE (Kansas City) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that to commemorate its new call letters in 1938, radio station KITE in Kansas City, Missouri, gave away 15,000 kites to children?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KITE (Kansas City).

Wikipedia

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that when it changed its call letters in 1938, radio station KITE in Kansas City gave away 15,000 kites to children? Source: p18

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph A. Canning

Created by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 05:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well written. Hook is very interesting and supported by supplied source. QPQ is done. However, I'm a little uncomfortable with the wording of the first paragraph under "History", which is a bit too close to the source, see Earwigs comparison. -Zanhe (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zanhe: Check now, I was able to reduce my reliance on that source in several areas. Raymie (t • c) 20:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the improvements. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 08:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]