Talk:Jumper (2008 film)/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Jumper (film)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Plot section, "movie" should be replaced with "film".
- I rewrote portions of the plot and removed a portion of the sentence referencing the film itself. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Nehrams2020 and check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- I rewrote portions of the plot and removed a portion of the sentence referencing the film itself. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- In the Plot section, "movie" should be replaced with "film".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Seeing other articles, shouldn't the cast section be bolded, (ex: Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith). The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here.
- I bolded the cast section and removed two of the red links. I think the rest have the possibility of being created as articles in the future. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops, I removed them all. I think that you should reinsert them when the articles have actually been created, because they could take a while [to be created]. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 13:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops, I removed them all. I think that you should reinsert them when the articles have actually been created, because they could take a while [to be created]. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 13:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- I bolded the cast section and removed two of the red links. I think the rest have the possibility of being created as articles in the future. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Seeing other articles, shouldn't the cast section be bolded, (ex: Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith). The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- Does Reference 40 cover all this ---> "A video game titled Jumper: Griffin's Story was made for the Xbox 360, PlayStation 2, and Wii consoles. The storyline focuses on the character Griffin as he attempts to avenge the death of his parents. Nicholas Longano of the video game publisher Brash Entertainment stated, "From the very first script read, we knew this had to be made into a game. The teleportation elements make for some very compelling gameplay"?
- This reference does cover all three sentences. When referencing statements, my priority is to make sure all questionable content is sourced, and would have used two references to cover all three statements. If desired, I can use the reference multiple times, but the sentence concerning the different platforms and the plot of the game didn't seem necessary to source. Let me know if you want me to reuse the current inline citation. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's alright, as long as the source covers the info., then its fine and check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- This reference does cover all three sentences. When referencing statements, my priority is to make sure all questionable content is sourced, and would have used two references to cover all three statements. If desired, I can use the reference multiple times, but the sentence concerning the different platforms and the plot of the game didn't seem necessary to source. Let me know if you want me to reuse the current inline citation. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Does Reference 40 cover all this ---> "A video game titled Jumper: Griffin's Story was made for the Xbox 360, PlayStation 2, and Wii consoles. The storyline focuses on the character Griffin as he attempts to avenge the death of his parents. Nicholas Longano of the video game publisher Brash Entertainment stated, "From the very first script read, we knew this had to be made into a game. The teleportation elements make for some very compelling gameplay"?
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- In the Box office performance section, this ---> "in the hopes of pulling in business on Valentine's Day", sounds like POV.
- This is from the reference provided. Since the film was targeted at both men and women, it was believed that more tickets could be sold for Valentine's dates. Let me know if you need further clarification. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explaining it and check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is from the reference provided. Since the film was targeted at both men and women, it was believed that more tickets could be sold for Valentine's dates. Let me know if you need further clarification. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- In the Box office performance section, this ---> "in the hopes of pulling in business on Valentine's Day", sounds like POV.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, after reading the article, I have gone off and passed the article. Congratulations. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to Nehrams and Corn.u.co.pia who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)