Talk:Juliana Force/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Juliana R. Force/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 00:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- "because of her passion for folk art, this initial display led to the first official public exhibition of folk art in a public showing presentation." Please forgive me, but I am unclear what "presentation" means in this context.
Done Changed to - Because of her passion for folk art, this initial display led to the first official public exhibition of folk art in a demonstration.- @Aussie Article Writer: Will that work? --Doug Coldwell (talk)
- Perfect! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
The following is referenced by a few citations, but when I checked the link, it takes me to an article about Annie Oakley? Are you sure this is the right page? The citation is: James, Edward (1971). Notable American Women, 1607–1950: A Biographical Dictionary. Harvard University Press. p. 645. ISBN 978-0-674-62734-5. W - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)- I figured out what the situation was. The biography has numerous volumes, the one being linked to was wrong and needed to be changed to Volume 1. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- Earwig shows no issues.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- File:Juliana Force.jpg - tagged correctly, fair use rationale is correctly applied
- File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - CC image
- File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - PD image
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- File:Juliana Force.jpg - fair use image of the subject
- File:NY Studio School 8 W8th cloudy jeh.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original building
- File:Whitney Museum of American Art original 0000 door.jpg - Whitney Museum of American Art's original entrance
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Except for the one referencing issue and a question on one sentence, this is a great nomination for GA! Well done on your hard work. Please clarify the sentence and correct the reference, after which I will check it, if that's good then I am happy to pass. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- excellent, this passes GA! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Except for the one referencing issue and a question on one sentence, this is a great nomination for GA! Well done on your hard work. Please clarify the sentence and correct the reference, after which I will check it, if that's good then I am happy to pass. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
