Jump to content

Talk:Josh Allen/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 14:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Criteria

[edit]

1. Well-written

Prose clear, concise, and understandable checkY
Spelling, grammar, copy edit issues checkY
Lead checkY
Layout checkY
Buzzwords/fiction/lists checkY Good use of tables to display statistics.

2. Verifiable

No original research checkY None apparent.
Inline citations are from reliable sources ☒N  Done References 49 & 54 (Buffalo Rumblings) and 22 (SBNation) are to sports blogs. While I think SBNation and its team-specific blogs write useful and interesting content, I don't think they rise to the level of reliable sources. Reference 23 is to TMZ, and per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, there is not consensus on the reliability of TMZ for BLP pages. Reference 21 is to the New York Post, of which there is also no consensus at the perennial sources list, although the supplement to the RS guideline does state that "most editors prefer more reliable sources when available." Since the statement cited by sources 21-23 is also discussed in reference 24, an ESPN article, you could probably just remove 21-23 from the article.
List of references properly formatted checkY
No COPYVIO checkY Testing several sentences by Google search. One brought up matches at a possible mirror site which doesn't seem to be functioning anymore, and at revolvy.com, which attributes the content to Wikipedia. Another turned up wikivisually, which appears to also be a mirror site. There are no red flags for COPYVIO, and my tests turned up clean.

3. Broad in coverage

Covers major aspects checkY
Stays focused on topic checkY

4. Neutral checkY

5. Stable checkY

  • As of writing. Allen is participating in an NFL playoff game on Jan. 4, so a spike in vandalism could occur if he does really good or really bad. But long-term, its been stable.

6. Illustrated if possible

Media tagged for copyright status checkY Images appear to be used properly, according to image licensing information.
Media relevant checkY