Jump to content

Talk:José López (infielder)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:José Celestino López)

Contact hitter?

[edit]

Sorry, I'm Bulgarian, so I probably don't know enough about baseball, but why is he described as a "contact hitter", when his career batting average is .271? Isn't a contact hitter supposed to have a much higher batting average? --Christomir (talk) 11:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a career average of .271 is not bad at all. He is described as a contact hitter because he rarely strikes out and is usually able to make contact with the ball. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.36.227 (talk) 23:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José López (baseball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]