Talk:Jonita Lattimore/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 05:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to inform the users associated with the article that I am quick-failing the article for the following reasons.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Overlinking, linking to pages that don't exist, grammar, paragraph structure. ect.. ect..
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I see you quick-failed Jonita Lattimore. There is a problem with the permalinks on the Sun-Times articles. I have a call into the Chicago Public Library. If you assumed that each failed URL were to a valid print edition page, this would pass the citations. I don't think that almost any of the images are improperly licensed. Can you please elaborate. With this many images if only one or two are improperly licensed, you have misevaluated the images section.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:52, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I may need to tag the ProQuest newspapers with membership required. I think if you take into account the Newsbank permalink error and a possible need to refine the ProQuest links as membership required, this would pass several of the sections above.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:55, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]