Talk:Jonathan Pearce

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Biography

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Requested move 19 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move pages. (closed by non-admin page mover) — YoungForever^(talk) 23:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– The commentator is the default page and gets 80 views a day while the fighter gets 170, at least recently. Because both are trading number of views, I think "Jonathan Pearce" should default to a DAB page because there is no clear primary topic. Marty2Hotty (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. There are three men listed upon the Jonathan Pearce (disambiguation) page, as well as one with a differently-spelled surname, with no indication that the sports commentator's notability is at such a high level that it outshines the combined renown of the other men. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support (strongly) per nom. No clear primary topic for this name, so the safest bet is to move the disambiguation page to the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, both have spikes[[1]] and I don't see a clear primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 12:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - no PRIMARYTOPIC. Giant Snowman 12:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the above. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.