Talk:John Brennan (CIA officer)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Brennan (CIA officer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Recent edits
[edit]Recent edits by Alainlambert appear to be undue emphasis on a broad investigation into 2016 by a US attorney, and are worded to imply that Brennan is being specifically investigated. This is not appropriate in a BLP, unless more specific charges are being made, and the net effect is a set of vague aspersions that breach BLP. Acroterion (talk) 23:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- I concur. The use of the word "criminal" in the section header is especially telling, and a clear violation of BLP policy. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear Acroterion, It is against Wikipedia rules for you to ascribe motives to my edits. It is extremely offensive to me and it is an attack on my honesty, integrity and good faith to distort my edits to attack me personally. I kindly accept your apology ahead of your apology. Wikipedia is a serious undertaking with a serious need for credibility. We all need to focus on that common goal, not personal goals. Agreed? Best regards. Alainlambert (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear Cullen, so we need to call things differently than reality? For what purpose? Point of View? Point of View is a clear violation of Wikipedia rules. So yes, let's discuss and start here: (i) were any of my sources not Reliable Sources?, (ii) did I inaccurately quote the sources, (iii) were my edit fully supported by Reliable Sources, and (iv) are you ready to take the exact same stance and go edit the Rudy Giuliani page for the exact same reason you are taking here, and (v) if not, why not? Best regards, Alain Alainlambert (talk) 06:14, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
John Brennan was not the 5th CIA directory
[edit]the info under his photo states Brennan was the 5th CIA directory that is not correct old man george bush was the 11th cia director brennan was after that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.240.20.196 (talk) 17:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Bush 41 was the 11th Director of Central Intelligence. Brennan was the 5th Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. It is confusing. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hunter Biden Laptop/Email declared Disinformation
[edit]Hat thread from indeffed user |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Certainly one of the central names on https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000
Loopbackdude (talk) 16:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a comma after "Kyle" in the personal life section. Colemal (talk) 21:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Instead of doing that, I have removed the names of all three children as they are all non-notable. For such a notable and hated man (by the fringes), their privacy is important. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 22:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hunter Biden email controversy was in October 2020, not October 2000. Johndoe11232316 (talk) 07:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done Typo fixed. (bojo)(they/them)(talk) 07:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Espionage articles
- Low-importance Espionage articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States Government articles
- Unknown-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- Unreferenced United States Government articles
- Unreferenced United States articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class New Jersey articles
- Low-importance New Jersey articles
- WikiProject New Jersey articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press