Talk:John Baker White (clerk of court)/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:John Baker White (Virginia)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 13:56, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Will review within the next 3 days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Lede and early life
I don't think you need to link soldier, a lot of links as it is!
- Business
- During the absence of the board's president, David Gibson, White served as president pro tempore November 29 through December 13, 1839. -shouldn't there be a "from" after tempore? I'd prefer "until" instead of "through" too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Preservation
- Delink Union Army, already linked
- Delink bound, unnecessary
- Delink Romney in second image
- Death
- Delink Hampshire County Courthouse
- Change "remarked of" to "said of"
Delink hospitality in last section
Love the house image in the snow, reminds me of the house at the beginning of Citizen Kane!
- Dr. Blofeld, thank you for the kind words! I took this image while I was in Romney during the February 2010 Snowmageddon. It's a beautiful old house indeed! One of these days, you'll have to visit Romney when you're stateside as you've reviewed many of the articles relating to her! -- Caponer (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
@Caponer: Excellent work, looks pretty sound, but you do tend to link excessively I must admit! Meets GA criteria, will pass once you've addressed. Cheers! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld:, thank you for taking the time to review this article! I admit that I am a bit of an excessive linker, so I've gone through and tried to weed out further instances for wiki-links were superfluous or unnecessary! Take another look when you have a chance, and let me know if you find anything else that needs tweaking or removed! Once again, thank you for taking the time to thoroughly review this article--Mr. White and I are both very grateful! -- Caponer (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)