Talk:Jinke Road station/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

I will review this one. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Criterion 1a (Prose quality)

Lead

• 2 exits --> two exits

History

• The opening of Jinke Road alleviated traffic away from the Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park station --> The opening of the Jinke Road station diverted traffic from the Zhangjiang...
• to improve power supply and other equipment --> to improve power supply and other utilities

Facilities

• "The station is an island platform with two tracks, one eastbound and one westbound, on either side." -- Are there two tracks on either side, or two tracks in total?
• You repeat station quite a bit in this section. Mix it up a bit so it doesn't sound as redundant, perhaps exchanging "station" for the station's actual name.

Services

• Since all the others are formatted in said manner, "five to ten minutes" should be made "5 to 10 minutes" for consistency's sake.

Criterion 1b (Lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, list incorporation correctly applied)

Lead

• The lead could include a tidbit about the effect of the station on Shanghai's Line 2, which was described in the History section.

Criterion 2a (All info cited)

• Reference 2 and all other foreign-language articles should have an added "language" parameter that denotes that it is written in Chinese. Go to the Cite web template for details on how to do that.
• The text cited between references two and three don't seem to appear in reference 3 (after Google Translate was done with it, anyways). I think the best place to cite the statistics using reference 2 (Li Xin) is after Pudong Software Park.
• Use reference 6 to cite the bus stop information in place of reference 5 (Google Maps). Also, just say that the whole station is located south of Zuchongzhi Road.
• I don't see how the 55 minutes to East Xujing/35 minutes to Pudong Airport tidbit is cited by the timetables of reference 8.

Criterion 2b (Challengeable info is cited)

• Cite the 223 stations portion of the History section.
• Cite the 19 stations section of the History section.

Criterion 2c (No original research)

All clear here.

Criterion 3a (all topics covered)

The article is short, but from what I see in other GA'd railroad stations, it is sufficiently broad.

Criterion 3b (well-focused)

All good here.

Criterion 4 (Neutral)

No problems in this one.

Criterion 5 (Stable)

Looks good.

Criterion 6a (Images follow copyright rules)

No images. Adding some would be nice, if you could, but if not, don't worry about it.

Criterion 6b (Images are relevant and have good captions)

Again, no images here, so this is all clear.

Overall comments

You're almost set! After the few copyediting and reference nitpicks are taken care of, this one will make GA. Nice work so far, Pzoxicuvybtnrm! --Starstriker7^(Talk) 03:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

There really isn't much work left to be done, but it looks like you haven't been active on Wikipedia since late May. I'm not going to pass this article because the issues haven't been addressed in a timely manner, but when you return to Wikipedia, feel free to nominate this again after the fixes. :)

Also, if any other editor is interested in doing these fixes in PCB's place, don't hesitate to do so. This article has GA potential. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 15:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)