Jump to content

Talk:Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Jin-Roh)

Ending

[edit]

{{spoiler}} I don't agree with the ending displayed here, but wanted to give my reasons before changing it. "Jin-Roh" is a personal favorite and I've watched it quite a few times. I've never read an interpretation of the ending that suggests that Kei was shot by a sniper. The stare on Fuse's face that suggests he's lost his emotions and his soul, his body language, and the general narrative of the story (Fuse being unable to kill at the beginning; the Wolf eating up Red Riding Hood) pretty-much point to Fuse killing her.

I understand the confusion about the sniper. This is an Oshii movie. If there wasn't any confusion I'd be surprised. If you watch the scene again, the sniper has his weapon cocked and is putting it back on safety, implying that he was standing by to kill Kei and possibly Fuse as well if he was unable to carry out his duties. Palm_Dogg 00:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree, though at first I assumed the sniper killed her. As an added bit of evidence suggesting Fuse killed Kei, you can see smoke rising from the pistol Fuse is holding immediately after she's shot.--Lazybratsche 09:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this needs to be changed. I'll do it in the near future if no one else has. I've run into a surprising number of people who are under the impression that the sniper, rather than Fuse, kills Kei at the end of the movie. This is unfortunate (in my opinion) in that it significantly alters the perceived tone of the narrative, but it's fairly clear upon close inspection that Fuse is the one who shoots Kei. jelo 02:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too, the sniper's gun isn't smoking, while (but you have to pay attention here) some smoke is visible when Kei falls to the ground. I understand why this is confusing, but the article really shouldn't say that it's definitely not Fuse.Evilbu 20:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even all the body language and the plot evidence aside, from technical standpoint it's clear that it's Fuse who shot her. There is smoke rising from under her body as she fall to the ground, with Fuse's gun being in the same place before his hand drops. Also, most importantly, as Palm Dogg mentioned, the sniper returns his Mauser's hammer into the original position after she was shot, and no smoke can be seen rising from his gun. Tani unit 00:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-Up

[edit]

Major props to everyone editing the Jin-Roh page, but it does need a clean-up. The page looks like a collection of tidbits without much organization, so I'll try to tighten it up and bring it more in line with the WikiProject Films, but will also make an effort not to change the content or do too many edits. Palm_Dogg 23:31, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Did some edits for clarity, grammar, and conciseness, also inserted the reference to Bereitschaftpolizei since evidently none of the earlier authors were aware of this parallel to the movie's Capitol Police. Wombat socho (talk) 19:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rotkäppchen story

[edit]

In the movie the story of little red riding hood is different then the usual grandmother version. Is it possible for anyone who has the movie to write down that version and post it in the article?

It seems near-identical to the original (that is to say, presumed original, but likely itself a retelling or amalgamation of other stories) version of the story, except for the whole armor thing. I've heard versions of Little Red Riding Hood that included armor, as well as an iron shirt or corset, but they usually differed from the original in other ways. At any rate, I assume these are the official subs; didn't get a chance to rent it again, so had to settle for a download. If anyone could supply the Japanese version, or a link to an appropriate article on Wikipedia Japan, that'd probably enhance this further. I suppose a transcript of the German text visible onscreen might also have its uses.
The first excerpt we read, minor editing errors intact:
"Once upon a time, there was a little girl. Who had not seen her mother in 7 years. Her mother had dressed her in armor and told her: 'When this armor has been well worn, come see me'. So the girl rubbed the armor against the walls to wear it down. And when she finally succeeded... She took some milk, bread, cheese and butter and went off to visit her mother. In the woods, she met a wolf. The wolf asked her what she was carrying. 'Milk, bread, cheese and butter', she replied. So the wolf asked for some food, but the girl refused, because it was a present for her mother. The wolf asked the girl if she was taking the Path of Pins or the Path of Needles. 'The Path of Pins.' she replied. So the wolf ran along the Path of Needles and devoured the girl's mother. Finally, the girl arrived at her mother's house. 'Mother. Open the door!' 'Come right in. The door is unlocked' replied the wolf.
The second, unless I missed one. Precious little time on my hands, just skimming the movie, so I may well make a mistake or two:
"And what of the girl who had chosen the Path of Pins? [This may just be Fuse asking an aptly-phrased question] 'Come in, it's open' said the wolf. But the door remained closed, so she crept through a hole in the wall. 'Mother, I'm hungry.' 'There's meat in the cupboard.' It was the flesh of her mother, who had been slain by the wolf. A cat sitting on the cupboard said to her: 'You're eating your mother's flesh.' 'Mother, there's a cat on the cupboard who says that I've eaten your flesh.' 'It's lying, of course. Throw your shoe at it.' After finishing the meat, the girl was thirsty. 'Mother, I'm thirsty.' 'Drink the wine in the pitcher.' And so she drank. Then a bird perched on the chimney said to her: 'You're drinking your mother's blood. It's your mother's blood.' 'Mother, a bird on the chimney told me that I was drinking my mother's blood.' 'Throw your hood at it.' After having eaten the flesh and drunk the blood, the girl turned to her mother and said: 'Mother, I'm so very tired.' 'Come, lie down next to me.'"
Last of all, unless I missed yet more. Which I'm nearly certain I did; I recall the wolf's replies being mentioned in the film's version of the story. No quotation marks for any of the dialogue in the subs here:
"The girl got undressed and approached the bed, where her mother lay in a strange position, her face covered by a hood. Mother! My, what big ears you have. Mother! My what big eyes you have. Mother! My, what big claws you have. Mother! My, what big teeth you have. And so, the wolf devoured the Little Red Riding Hood."
So, yeah. Those seem about sequential, can't possibly be more than a line or two missing between them. Feel free to indent, capitalize, and punctuate that as you see fit. A string of subtitles does not a paragaph make. 82.166.48.20 21:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
there is a slight issue with that, as the story in the movie spoke of an unnamed authority figure who put Red into the iron clothing. i have edited it as such. the source is the movie as it has been localized to the United States. (152.65.72.172 (talk) 04:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

no SF but Retro fiction

[edit]

this anime is not part of the "science fiction" genre but the "retro fiction" genre instead. The term exists in French as "Rétrofiction" and "Retro-Fiction", it probably exists in English too. Other Retro fiction anime are Kishin Heidan (great OAVs known as Kishin Corps in English anglophone countries), Steamboy and Osamu Tezuka's Metropolis.
Shame On You 08:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Science fiction (as it is used in English) encompasses a wide range of 'fantastic' fictional scenarios and, while Jin-Roh is certainly an alternate history, it also fits in the genre of science fiction

Fair use rationale for Image:Hellhoundsmanga.png

[edit]

Image:Hellhoundsmanga.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just read the article

[edit]

Time to remove the "This article or section resembles a fan site." template? I dont think the article resembles a fan site at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.17.141.53 (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I removed the tag. In my opinion, Wikipedia:Fancruft and especially Wikipedia:Fancruft#Tone and focus is not the case. --Cyfal (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ending

[edit]

So is it Kazuki that kills her at the end, or the sniper? Or is this left to the viewer to decide? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.153.204.101 (talk) 22:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had to re-watch it because I wasn't sure either. But going back it's clear Kazuki did. While Kei is sliding down from his embrace, you can briefly see smoke from his Mauser pistol and its slide open. The guy in the shack was just in case Kazuki didn't follow through with it. --Dejitarob (talk) 08:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Massive cleanup

[edit]

I just did a massive, massive cleanup of the article. The article looks like it was written for a fan wiki and goes into way more detail about the universe. I've trimmed it so that this page looks more like a traditional Wikipedia film page. The plot section is still too big. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable translation

[edit]

Source 14 is highly suspect. "He did not want to do another movie with dogs in it"? What the hell does that mean? The dogs and wolves in these movies aren't literal. Nukleon (talk) 00:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jin-Roh:_The_Wolf_Brigade&oldid=1253910344"