Jump to content

Talk:Jim Walsh (Irish politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CoI editing

[edit]

Walsh has admitted to editing the article. He hasn't offered any evidence on what exactly was "erroneous" about the comments, or how he knows the editor was or is a member of "the gay lobby groups." BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's now a section on his admitted editing. Autarch (talk) 15:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Which may be WP:UNDUE. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Reviewing quickly, the history shows that we misrepresented Walsh. We should not, therefore, get too excited over his editing this article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Can you clarify your assertions? Are you referring to the section on Wikipedia editing or all of the article? Snappy (talk) 20:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We said
  • Walsh argued that proponents of same-sex marriage were "dangerous and vicious".
and
  • expressed annoyance that he couldn't call gay people "fairies"
It is clear that in the first case we omitted the word "some" and all context.
In the second case he is referring not to the inability to use the term, but the privileged position of others who can.
Both these readings are from the Independent article covering the editing itself.
The Irish Examiner references the second with an actual quote
If I were to call people fairies. I would be called a bigot and all sorts of things, but David Norris says it all the time and nothing is said.
And a supplementary comment:
“it wasn’t appropriate to be calling members of the gay community fairies”, because it leads to homophobia “and we have to rule that out”.
Similarly the first statement an actual quote can be found in the Examiner
dangerous, vicious elements within the gay ideological movement
The objection in Parliament was not to the characterisation as "dangerous and vicious" but that:
There is no such thing as the gay ideological movement.
Walsh continued:
Can I appeal to the more reasoned voices within the gay groups…to condemn this type of activity.
I have no idea what type of activity Walsh was referring to, but, while I would not expect us to say "Walsh claimed that some proponents of gay groups were reasonable" it is clear that he is not "arguing" anything, that he is not talking specifically about "proponents of same-sex marriage" and most importantly of all that the implied universal quantifier is absent, indeed inverted.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Post script: The debate in the Seanad Éireann can be read here. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Discussion at BLP (biographies of living persons) Noticeboard and Conflict of Interest (COI) Noticeboard

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jim Walsh (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jim Walsh (Irish politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jim_Walsh_(Irish_politician)&oldid=1257029466"