Talk:Jerusalem (Mendelssohn book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Article has been moved now to the article page. The talk page is free for discussions, and the article is awaiting your corrections and improvements.

--Platonykiss (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

English style edits needed

This article is very thorough and informative, but it appears to have been primarily written by someone who is not a native speaker of English. Some of the word choices and phrasings sound distinctly "foreign", as if the article had been translated from another language by someone who was conversant, but not completely fluent in English. It's mostly comprehensible, but the article would benefit if a native speaker who is familiar with the subject could edit it. I'd do it myself, but I'm too ignorant of the subject matter, and I'm afraid that I might accidentally introduce errors.

As an example of what I'm talking about, in the section "Moses Mendelssohn's Treatise “On Religious Power” and its Composition", one sentence begins thus: "Because he regarded the present critic on Judaism as a modern Christian prejudge which replaced the medieval ones..." . "Critic" and "prejudge" are not the right words. "Prejudge" should almost certainly be "prejudice" (as "prejudge" is a verb), but I'm not sure whether "critic" should be "critique" or "criticism", each of which have slightly different connotations.

I hope that a native speaker with more familiarity with the subject than I have can edit this otherwise excellent article and bring its style up to the high standard of its content. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite right, I am not a native speaker and I would be lucky, if the article would be improved in its style. Please feel free to take hands on this article, even if you do not believe to be an expert of the subject.

--Platonykiss (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My proposition to improve the phrase in discussion (including its mistaken tense forms):

Because he regarded the present accuses and complaints concerning the current state of Judaism as a modern Christian prejudice which just had replaced the medieval ones (like poisoning fountains, ritual slaughtering of Christian children on Pessah etc.)[7], his subject of amelioration was the religion and especially the one which had to be separated from the state.

If there is no argument against it, I will improve the discussed phrase thus.

--Platonykiss (talk) 10:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Supposed original research concerning revolutionary antisemitism

The term "revolutionary antisemitism" is not my personal research, but the one by Paul Lawrence Rose. One wikipedian reader was obviously carried away by the very own opinion with his/her complaint that references in this article are missing, because I do not think so. I inserted the requested notes, also an external link for those who might be interested in an English Marx biography (it is only in the note, because I do not agree that such a link can listed here as an "external link", since it is too far from the real subject here). An existing link to the entry of Heinrich Marx did already the job, because there was nothing said here which could not be regarded as common knowledge!

Therefore I removed the tag that this section has my own original research.--Platonykiss (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

German quotations.

In many ways it is really enjoyable to see the German quotations above the English (especially as someone who can read a fair bit thanks to Yiddish) but I'm 1. not sure if this is the uniform style for wikipedia (feel free to correct if wrong). 2. because of the large chunks of text, the German definitely makes the whole page harder to read. I think it'd be best to just use the English quotations, and perhaps the German word in brackets if the translation is not nuanced enough to highlight the point. Thank you for this brilliant contribution however. Noxiyu (talk) 16:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jerusalem (Mendelssohn). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]