Talk:Javan slow loris/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rev Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking up the review. Sasata and I look forward to your comments. – VisionHolder « talk » 16:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! Fine job with this article... everything is in order, after a couple nitpicks:

In Taxonomy and phylo, may we have more on its synonymy? Mention how the little dude goes from Nycticebus javanicus->Bradylemur tardigradus->N. tardigradus javanicus->N. javanicus. Also, albeit obvious, define the specific epithet javanicus. Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I may have something in one of the sources I have on my home computer. Most sources don't cover all the odd names from the time when taxonomic names were all over the place. However, I think the article already covers its promotion from N. tardigradus javanicus to N. javanicus. I'll check when I get home from work this evening. – VisionHolder « talk » 15:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I found the source for Lesson's Bradylemur tardigradus online, and added a source & link for that. Couldn't find online the actual sources for the remaining two synonyms, so I just mentioned them in the text and cited a recent source that listed the synonyms. This doesn't really cover why the genera or species names were changed, but at least they are mentioned in the text now. I also couldn't find a source that explicitly said that javanicus means "from Java", probably because it's so obvious. I'm putting it in the article uncited as a statement that is unlikely to be challenged. I'm hoping a library trip this weekend will shed more details about the taxonomy (detials which will probably be necessary for FAC). Sasata (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good... I will pass the article! Its nice seeing you get your head out of the mushroom vapors occasionaly, Sasata... jeez Louise ;) Nice working with you again Visionholder! Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lol! There'll be more of these cutesy big-eyed primates coming down the pipe, but it's only a temporary diversion ... my heart still lies with the fungi ;-) Sasata (talk) 04:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review! Likewise, I'll eventually get back to my lemurs. – VisionHolder « talk » 06:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Javan Slow Loris passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass