Talk:Jason Day

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Golf Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jason Day is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

August 16 to 22, 2015 (10th)

Ext links

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

It seems odd that some of the ext links have an "official site" qualifier. 203.173.186.163 (talk) 06:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: According to the page's protection level and your user rights, you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jason Day (golfer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hills.qld.edu.au/documents/244.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.queenslandgolf.org.au/playerdevelop/playerprofiles/profileday.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://tmag.com/media/pressreleases/2006/071406_jason_day.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have consensus that this is the primary topic. Cúchullain ^t/c 16:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Day (golfer) → Jason Day
Jason Day → Jason Day (disambiguation)

– Clearly the golfer is now the primary topic. He's been top 10 in the world for a few years and has won a major. Page view stats are overwhelming. The-Pope (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mild Oppose probably he does pass the threshold in of more than 66% references in Google Books, just. However there's still a good chance of mislinks with Jason Day (fighter) (born 1981), Canadian mixed martial artist, Jason Day (actor) (born 1985), Peruvian actor, Jason Day (rower) (born 1970), Australian Olympic rower, and (golfer) appears to be helping readers find the golfer at the moment. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – moving a title to a more ambiguous title based on recent popularity via a primarytopic grab does nobody any good. Dicklyon (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support, per the golfer establishing himself as far more notable than the competition + pageviews pointing overwhelmingly in his favor. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 02:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Seriously? 99% of pageviews for the golfer? And we'd rather send readers to the dab page because...? Dohn joe (talk) 03:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per overwhelming page view statistics in favor of the golfer. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support there has been a large spike recently, such that the golfer has received 98.6% of page views over the last 90 days. But even looking at the first two months of the year when there was less traffic, he still received 94% of the page views. If that is not enough to establish a primary topic then I don't know what is. Meanwhile, I can't see any basis for the oppose that claims "recent popularity". The rower's article was created yesterday and the other two have barely advanced beyond stub level in the years that the articles have existed. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support An obvious primary topic if I ever saw one. Let's see what the other topics are: some Peruvian actor with a thin IMDb and a whopping 11 credits, a retired martial artist with a 61% win rate who fought mostly non-notable people, and an Olympic rower who went home empty-handed and has not been active in his field for 15 years. If one of these folks somehow manage to rise above a PGA champion and world no. 1 golfer in the future, I'll eat my hat. Nohomersryan (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - easy primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nohomersryan's sound and accurate analysis about the alternative topics. 98.6% of page views is also a solid enough evidence of the golfer being the primary topic for our readers. Cavarrone 06:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nohomersryan and other arguments of Primary use policy. CookieMonster755 ^(talk) 03:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - pageviews & easily the primary topic. Kingutd (talk) 01:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jason Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]