Jump to content

Talk:Jaipur foot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Jaipur leg)

Untitled

[edit]

Please note that the obituary for Dr. Sethi in New York Times indicates he developed the Jaipur "foot" (as it is referenced by NYT) with the help of "Ramachandra Sharma, a semiliterate craftsman who had been teaching lepers to make handicrafts and who became his assistant". The Wiki article here should be updated if the NYT obit is accurate.

Thanks -

Todd Todd (talk) 13:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYT article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/world/asia/08seti.html?_r=1&ref=obituaries&oref=slogin

I wonder if Sharma and Chandra are two versions of the same Indian name? Maybe an Indian native could step in here and help out.

Sharma and Chandra are not two versions. They are entirely different words. Chandra means moon. Sharma is a surname used by a certain caste.

Todd (talk) 13:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Lancet obit refers to him as "Ram Chandra", "Chandra" and "Ram Chandra Sharma". I wonder if the Sharma is an honorific? Espresso Addict (talk) 09:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jaipur leg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cost

[edit]

So far I have references for $50, 250 rupees or 3 euros, $28, $80 or $50-$100, $65, $33 and $45, which is what the article currently says. Any ideas for a more authoritative source or a way to reconcile these numbers? I suspect the actual answer is that it varies significantly based on who is making it and where, the materials used, etc, but I can't find a source to back that claim up. Rusalkii (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]