Talk:Jacksonville metropolitan area

Florida Mid‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jacksonville (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jacksonville, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.JacksonvilleWikipedia:WikiProject JacksonvilleTemplate:WikiProject JacksonvilleJacksonville articles

Untitles

At first I thought it was a good idea for user Mb93j to create this page, but now I'm wondering if it is essentially the same as the First Coast, making it redundant? Kevinsnow 16:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, Baker County is in the Jax Metro area, while it isn't in the First Coast. Also, Flagler County is in the First Coast but is closer to Daytona. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 01:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot understand why the Jacksonville Metropolitan Area includes five counties! That isn't correct. The five counties are not formally joined politically, economically or commercially. The five have their own governments, departments of public safety, their own commerical drivers and financial focus. 68.218.155.46 11:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Statistical Areas are defined by the Office of Management and Budget based on economic factors. They are designed to represent large areas that functio as a single business market. -- Donald Albury 23:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shortening 'major roads' section

I'm going to shorten the details of the routes because it's too much. If people want to learn more, they can go to the transportation page. --MPQzy (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacksonville metropolitan area → Greater Jacksonville – This page needs to be moved because Greater Jacksonville is a more common name for the area. --MPQzy (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, for consistency with other metro areas and because the article specifically describes the official U.S. government definition of the area (whereas "Greater Jacksonville" may be less well defined in the eyes of its residents). Powers ^T 13:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Name

I reverted a move of this article to Jacksonville, Florida metropolitan area. First, if "Jacksonville metropolitan area" remains a redirect, the "Florida" is just verbiage unnecessary for disambiguation. Second, this appears to be the clear primary topic of the two articles. The only other ambiguous article can now be found easily through the hat note.--Cúchullain ^t/c 03:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To this point, the Florida metro was viewed 1960 times in the last 30 days, compared to only 239 for the North Carolina metro. The latter article may be low since I just added the hat note a few days ago, but at any rate it suggests the Florida article is easily more prominent in this TWODABS situation.--Cúchullain ^t/c 03:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no history section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.144.152 (talk) 02:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacksonville metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]