Talk:JCorps

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Renominate for deletion

Last discussion about deletion was in 2008. That was withdrawn. However, since that time, there doesn't appear to be any notable news, accomplishments, leadership, goals achieved, or otherwise. The description says this is a volunteering organization, which is nice, but has it accomplished anything, have notable people come out of it, has it made a difference to the people it serves or to the people who have been members? Has membership grown? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tipclaysailak (talk • contribs) 00:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→ It should be noted that Tipclaysailak (talk was removed/blocked from editing Ari Teman for the same vendetta-style vandalism that seems to be happening here.

Tipclaysailak appears to have been a SPA, but they have never been blocked for anything. [1] Edward321 (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puffery Tag

There is no Talk discussion on the Puffery tag -- what specific words are puffery, as everything is linked to a news article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.168.227.138 (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some examples are most everything in the Mission section, especially "It provides a low-pressure, high-activity environment where people can get to know each other while working on a shared task." which reads like a promotional brochure, not an encyclopedia article. The unsourced claim to being invited to the Gracie Mansion is also promotional in nature. The various claims about Ari Teman were also promotional, but I have removed them. Edward321 (talk) 13:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat Vandalism

There has been repeat vandalism to this page. It seems to be by the same people who repeatedly vandalized the page "Ari Teman" until a lawsuit had to be initiated and it was deleted. This is a tragic example of Wikipedia being used by some unwell individual to harass someone, and it would be nice if an admit put an end to the vandalism by protecting the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.168.227.138 (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Ari Teman page was nominated for deletion based on lack of notability. It was deleted based on the policy "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete.". (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Teman) Accusations of vandalism need to be accompanied by evidence, otherwise they are personal attacks. Edward321 (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on JCorps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615055413/http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/36_under_36_next_wave_social_justice_global_change to http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/36_under_36_next_wave_social_justice_global_change

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]