Talk:It's Your Fault (video)

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in November 2013.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

I think that this article must be deleted. The video is hardly viral (just 3 million views in about an year). If this is the definition of viral, then there are thousands of other youtube videos that must be considered viral. Further, I strongly suggest that Wikipedia create a benchmark for defining which video is famous enough to be written as a wiki article, else the platform starts getting exploited for advertising purposes. For example, the implicit purpose of this article seems to be advertising for an agency named All India Bakchod. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.29 (talk) 21:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Potential DYK

I created this article yesterday. It has the potential to hit DYK. LEmme know what you think. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I noticed this article was tagged with Notability. Can someone throw some light on why it is NOT notable about it? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I added the tag because it didn't seem to meet the notability requirements for films as explained at WP:NF and copied here:

The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.
The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:
- Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.
- The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.
- The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release.
- The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.
The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.
The film is "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

If I'm wrong, I'm quite happy to remove the tag. All we need are some sources identifying one or more of the above. — Mr. V (t – c) 13:26, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not exactly a film. It's a video; that went viral. It has been viewed 2,799,990 times. One [or more] of the sources included state that it criticizes several statements made post the 2012 Delhi gang rape. It has been mentioned in three non Indian articles, The HuffPost, Independent, and WahsingtonPost. [I will add them to the article]. I think it satisfies WP:GNG enough. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfied WP:GNG! Considering the way it went viral a month ago [or a couple of], and also its mentions in viral, it in many way passes the debate of notability. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfied? For a video that has only 3 million views in an year? Further, I still do not see any references to non-Indian articles (not that I consider that to be any standard for notability). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.29 (talk) 22:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]