A fact from It's All About the Looks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Created 6 days before nom. Earwig isn't flagging anything concerning. The article is well written, with no concerns of note. Cited source required a bit of digging, since the archived title: "Hito ga Mukou ga 100 Percent" varies slightly from the article's title. I've spoken with someone who is fluent in Japanese to confirm the source properly cites the claim. Hook is interesting enough. The hook is good to go. Etriusus (Talk)17:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]