Talk:Islam and pork

I added the NPOV message because the article as currently written advocates a particular view and contains unsourced assertions. The article states that Christians are forbidden to eat pork, which only a tiny minority of Christians believe. Advocating the argument that Christians should interpret the Bible to include a prohibition on eating pork violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy. The comments about "cat meat sandwiches," etc. are pure argumentation and do not reflect a NPOV. Similarly, using the abbreviation "pboh" after identifying prophets,etc. violates the NPOV policy because it reflects the author's particular religious views. Finally, the claims about pigs being "one of the filthiest animals on earth" without a source or the use of objective standards violates Wikipedia's policies.

JS Blenkiron 20:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language

This entry uses "we" a lot to describe opinion of a group, which does not comply to wikipedia rules.

Bias

This article appears to be very biased and the language is rather distasteful - certainly not a neutral point of view.