Talk:Ishigaki Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Japan: Ryukyu Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:44, December 7, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Ryukyu task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Merger of Southwest Air Lines Flight 611

Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 08 February 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Ishigaki Airport. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 was the only significant aircraft accident at Ishigaki Airport. there was a separate article for flight 611 that was nominated for deletion on February 8 2012. per that discussion, the concensus was that the flight 611 article be merged into the parent article for Ishigaki airport. I have started that merger process and invite any further input. I felt that it was most fair to first merge the articles in their entirety, then leave further editing open for discussion. I have blanked the original flight 611 page and redirected here. Paffordmd72 (talk) 22:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 was copied or moved into Ishigaki Airport with this edit on 22:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Paffordmd72 (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up

The following series of edits have been made in order to clean up after the Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 article was merged here. First, the sections of the flight 611 text were restructured here[1] Paffordmd72 (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then removed the "nominated for deletion" tag here[2] Paffordmd72 (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then moved the flight 611 section to the main text of the airport article here[3]. My reasoning for replacing the section is that the accident is part of the history of the airport and therefore needed to be after the history section. I also reason that locating the text of the accident within the history section does not give it the attention it demands and therefore it needs to remain its own section.Paffordmd72 (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then gathered links here[4]. Paffordmd72 (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then relocated "Notes" section here[5]. Paffordmd72 (talk) 16:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then gathered categories and lists[6]. Paffordmd72 (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And finally, removed the "clean up" tag here[7]. I would not suggest that the article is completely clean or perfect, but I believe I have fixed all the issues that caused the tag to be added in the first place and therefore I removed it so that others can give there opinion. Paffordmd72 (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ishigaki Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160517110850/https://aisjapan.mlit.go.jp/ to https://aisjapan.mlit.go.jp/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825113418/http://rekishi.jkn21.com/ to http://rekishi.jkn21.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no second military use

The airport's area is by now (2019) largely taken over by the city. The Terminal is a hospital, most of the runway is removed, with a short strip of about 400m left yet untouched. The only aviation still going on there is a pad for the EMS helicopter, near the old firestation, which is now a regular firestation. Like in Shimojishima Airport people likely faught tooth and nail to keep out the military. Besides, moving the Airport out of the city was (besides the runway length) for safety and noise reasons. Turning the airport over for military use (with the accompanying loss of binding safety and environmental regulations) really makes no sense. --133.56.199.80 (talk) 08:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]