Jump to content

Talk:Isabella of Hainault

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Isabelle of Hainaut)

Alleged homosexual affair

[edit]

I deleted the reference to Philip's dislike of Isabelle being supposedly due to a homosexual relationship between Philip and Richard The Lion Heart,( who should have been refered to by his title of King Richard I ) as the author did not give any sources or citations for such a statement in an encyclopedia. The source I provided comes from Medieval Lands. One mustn't rely on sensationalised romantic fiction to obtain historical facts about individuals.jeanne (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image

[edit]

I think the seals in the infobox should be replaced by an image of Isabella.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The Rain Maiden" By Jill M. Phillips cited as a Source.

[edit]

On the reverse side of the second leaf into the book under the copyright notification reads...

"This is a work of fiction. The characters, names, incidents, places and dialogue are products of the author's imagination, and are not to be construed as real."

Sadly this makes me question the whole of this wikipedia entry.

I hope this information helps someone to amend it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.217.226 (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed it from the list of refs.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isabella of Hainault. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced date changes

[edit]

RoyalSnowbird, please do not make changes such as you have been making without providing a source, properly cited, in the article. Please do not leave lengthy edit summaries containing messages to other users; discuss questions and issues on the talkpage of the article (this page). See Wikipedia:Citing_sources and Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines.

@Jeanne boleyn:, I think you may have a source for Isabelle's birth date? I did not find a birth date on page 294 of the Bouchard source in Google Books.Eric talk 00:37, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insult me! - it is evident you protect bad practices here when the truth ought to be heard. If someone correcting does not bother to check info to which you are directed, then the onus is not on me. You leave errors perpetuate without any concern and to add insult to injury you leave this happening on profiles which belong to members of my own ancestors and have the audacity to tell me to 'take a chill pill, Your Royal Highness' which is imbued with a level of sarcasm and disrespect I do not deserve here after the failures seen here. I am legally a Princess and if formal complaint must be had it shall indeed be made to higher levels on this platform via proper authority I can most assure you! This information comes from reliable sources from the private records of my family in 'The Great Book' of my family which was transcribed and re-transcribed over generations and is part of my private collection. It is one of the most reliable records of the royal lines in my family. FIX the date as it should be. I am recording all this exchange... your insults and all which has transpired here shall come to be part of the annals of history whether you like it or not to shed light on the stupidity going on in here. Good day. RoyalSnowbird (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia's rules articles have to be verifiably sourced. A person's "word" isn't a verifiably claim or source, whoever he or she may pretend to be. -- fdewaele, 21 April 2019, 10:05 CET.