Talk:Ion pump

It is requested that a mechanical diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Untitled

There seems to be a misunderstanding of the meaning of "ion pump." This entry, "Ion pump (physics)" was created to refer to a vacuum pumps, as a disambiguation from Ion transporter. A vacuum ion pump ionizes residual gases and accelerates them towards a Ti cathode, causing a sputtering event, a process is is most decidedly -not- reversible -- the article previously stated that the process is reversible. User Mikiemike seems to have misunderstood this meaning and reverted the article, and added a reference regarding pumps which operate by means of action on ions in a fluid. This is an entirely separate topic from the vacuum ion pump and would necessitate a separate article. 24.155.69.144 (talk) 03:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sputtering process is not technically reversible but inert gasses that strike a Ti cathode can be ejected as neutrals which are then absorbed when they strike another surface. This is the basis for noble ion pumps, which use a Ta cathode which results in many more neutrals due to it's tight crystal lattice structure. --Rpm5099 (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ion pump head jpeg is a NEG cartridge possibly from SAES Getters

The image titled Ion pump head jpeg is a NEG cartridge possibly from SAES Getters.

It has a different pumping mechanism as it uses Non Evaporable Getter, activated with heat. This type of pump does not pump CH4 or noble gases. It should be on a different page.

I have many diagrams and images of cells and modules relating to ion pumps. I could upload these. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vacuumguru (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ion pump (physics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060509182437/http://www.aiv.it/ita/pubblicazioni/articolo.php?articolo=art4 to http://www.aiv.it/ITA/pubblicazioni/articolo.php?articolo=art4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading lede

The reference used to justify the claim that pressures "as low as" 1E-11 mbar is an Agilent brochure. On page 26 of that pamphlet, a table lists the "Ultimate Pressure" as "below 10E-11" [mbar] of their Vaclon Plus 500 pump. At those ultra-high vacuum conditions, the limiting factor is leakage and out-gassing, so it's misleading to make absolute claims about what is attainable imho. It's also probably worth pointing out that for these low pressures, both cryocooling and ion pumping are often combined.Abitslow (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Forbes72 (talk) 23:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SI Units please

Not much to say that's not already covered by the heading. I would rather that pressures are quoted in Torr, because that seems to be in wide use. But the correct SI Unit is Pascals. Either way Millibars is neither in wide usage or the standard unit. Andypreston (talk) 09:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]