Talk:Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes

Horse racing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Melbourne / Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move 20 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. SST flyer 01:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation Stakes → Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes – The registered race name of this event has not been used since 1974. The current race name has been used since 2006 and it seems that the Melbourne Racing Club is quite content. References of race results since 2006 indicate that there is little evidence of the registered race name. The current article for Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes is a redirect to this article, a simple switch would suffice Brudder Andrusha (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. In general I support use of registered race name to avoid frequent changes of article titles, but this applies more where the race is run under a sponsored name. This case looks different, the name in current use is not a sponsored name and appears from the evidence to have essentially replaced the registered name. Switch the article and redirect around. --Bcp67 (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bcp67: I have to agree with your comment in regards to trying to keep the registered name when possible since external sources in most cases refer to the name as such, especially from a breeding and stud POV, but in this case the registered name is not even used by the race club themselves and the original name is only referred to by historical coincidence. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 21:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support and if no one opposes, ping me, I have pagemover right and can do the move. (I probably shouldn't if it's a debate because now I'm involved) Montanabw^(talk) 22:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't go to the admins straightaway for this because we have had discussions about racenames before and the way sponsors get involved in changing race names. Rather have confirmation from our group that there are cases when the registered name has become obsolete and only referred to in a historical context such as with this article. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 07:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.