Talk:Inveresk and York Park Precinct, Launceston

Inveresk and York Park Precinct, Launceston received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Australia: Tasmania Low‑importance

	Australia portal Inveresk and York Park Precinct, Launceston is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Why on earth are you saying it should be deleted. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has no sources and no obvious notability.--Grahame (talk) 07:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want it delete it then improve it, as questions on how to improve it if your unsure but you shouldn't remove a tag which clearly states on it

"If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with its proposed speedy deletion, please add:"

You've added the holdon tage so leave it up to the Admin decide if they think it should be deleted or not. Bidgee (talk) 07:52, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is unnecessary. There doesn't appear to be much content to merge, but I propose merging and redirecting to Invermay, Tasmania (which is where Inveresk, Tasmania already redirects to) -- Chuq (talk) 08:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decision has been made. :) Aaroncrick (talk) 09:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The decision was made that it isn't speedy deletable under WP:CSD#G1 (something I agree with), nothing more nothing less. Merge is still the best option. -- Chuq (talk) 11:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest taking it up at WP:AFD if that is how you feel. Mvjs Talking 05:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more information so hopefully it's now more notable. Aaroncrick (talk) 01:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]