Talk:Intershop Communications AG

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Untitled

Intershop's website claims that it was founded in 1992. Just thought someone might like to edit that.

Actually this is "just" the US subsidiary of INTERSHOP. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.17.202.254 (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Product Update

The newest product of Intershop is now Commerce-as-a-Service (CaaS), a Cloud-based SaaS solution for digital commerce and digital customer portals.

See https://www.intershop.com/en/commerce-as-a-service

Could someone please update the product section of the article as it is outdated.

Thanks NilsBreitmann (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NilsBreitmann You must review and formally comply with the conflict of interest and paid editing policies(the latter is a Terms of Use requirement and mandatory). You posted a link to your LinkedIn profile but that is not sufficient. Regarding your request, Wikipedia is not a place for your company to tell the world about its products. You should confine that to your company's website. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources say about article subjects. If you have independent reliable sources that give significant coverage to this product(beyond a press release or other routine announcement), please offer it. 331dot (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

331dot I totally agree that Wikipedia is not a place for a company to tell the world about its products. However, Wikipedia should contain only correct and up-to-date information. Could you then please remove the products section of the article completely, instead of leaving it there wrong. NilsBreitmann (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As it was not cited, I have removed it. You still must comply with the policies I have indicated; you risk being blocked if you do not. 331dot (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have updated my user page. Is it sufficient now? I would like to further improve the article and get rid of the open issues. Is the best way to propose changes and provide information here on the talk page? NilsBreitmann (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the proper disclosure. Yes, you should propose edits on this page. To increase the odds your proposed edits will be seen by other editors, you may want to make them as formal edit requests(click for instructions). You should only edit the article in the limited circumstances described at this link. 331dot (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]