Talk:IRC operator

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IRC operator article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Requested move

IRC operator is not a proper noun, should be titled according to WP:NC#Lowercase_second_and_subsequent_words. Fugg 03:55, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move complete. Rob Church ^Talk 22:31, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article is very oriented towards UnrealIRCd

Many IRC servers do not have z:line, and on some IRC servers, k:lines are global. Additionally, not all IRC server software implement the Unreal scheme of operator ranking, and instead have simple admin and operator classes. Moreover, other IRC software allows ranks to be defined dynamically. --nenolod (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IRCop types

some IRC operator types are missing. such as the Server Admin, or the Co-Admin. Please add them. thank you. DorTheScripter 21:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you know about them, why not be WP:BOLD? Spoom^Talk 17:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Is the picture () really necessary? It seems like it serves no purpose. LiteralKa (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Relay Chat operator → IRC operator – WP:COMMONNAME. According to Google Search, "IRC operator" is 297 times more common --Relisted. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 67.252.103.23 (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support of course, per nom and per 3/5 of our naming criteria. Red Slash 20:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IRC operator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110322175909/http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/ircd/ircopguide.html to http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/ircd/ircopguide.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]