Talk:International Network to Promote the Rule of Law
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 April 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Hi there,
First time user here....
INPROL is, like many of the organizations listed on Wiki, a legitimate project that is worth being described here. If not, why are the United Nations, USInstitute of Peace, etc. listed in Wiki? Not trying to be "smart" just trying to understand the distinction. I would not qualify it as blatantly advertising, because the membership of INPROL is very selective and the initiative is not for profit. Therefore, a very select few of Wiki's users will actually qualify for membership. To further disconnect the advertisement of INPROL, I have removed the original section on "membership" and focused on the core functions of INPROL, which will be expanded upon in time.
Any suggestions on how to edit this further are welcome.
Thanks, Jerdossy (talk) 20:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- For starters, read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). This organization may be legitimate without being notable. The United Nations is universally acknowledged to be notable, regardless of what you think of the organization. Advertisement doesn't mean just trying to get Wikipedians to join; it also means creating articles whose purpose is to publicize the group, rather than to provide impartial information from unbiased third-party sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International Network to Promote the Rule of Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071207044401/http://www.opiniojuris.org/posts/1176334042.shtml to http://www.opiniojuris.org/posts/1176334042.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026232251/http://www.judicialmonitor.org/current/sectorassessment.html to http://www.judicialmonitor.org/current/sectorassessment.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)