Talk:Institute for the Study of the Ancient World
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insufficient inline citations
[edit]Are 13 inline citations sufficient? If so, remove the tag from 2009. If more are needed, supply them.--DThomsen8 (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402131152/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aFTWRsVQhuFo&refer=culture-redirectoldpage to https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aFTWRsVQhuFo&refer=culture-redirectoldpage
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion of Donation controversy
[edit]The Levy-White Foundation donation, which created the institute, was quite controversial. The controversy in full belongs to a separate page but would it make sense to add a short section here?
I'm considering doing it but wanted to check in with 'talk' to make sure I wasn't duplicating work.
https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/stable/3845582?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents