Jump to content

Talk:Enguri Dam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Inguri Dam)

Merger

[edit]

The river and the dam are a unity: merge them for encyclopedic treatment. --Wetman 09:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand why one would want that, could you please eleborate? sephia karta 11:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

Propose to merge Inguri Hydro Power Plant into this article because it is about the same subject.Beagel (talk) 20:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. sephia karta 21:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merger completed.Beagel (talk) 12:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

[edit]

Is it correct Inguri or Enguri in English? Most sources use spelling Enguri, therefore I propose to rename this article correspondingly.Beagel (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well as you say, there is not one correct form in English. Enguri reflects the Georgian spelling, while Inguri reflects more closely the Russian and Abkhazian spellings (in fact Abkhazian spelling would be Ingur). I have always been under the impression that Inguri is the most widely used English form but I may be wrong. sephia karta 14:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably you right about the sources of different spellings. Merging these articles I noticed that the EBRD, CE, different UN structures etc used mainly Enguri.Beagel (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Googling in English-language internet gives more results for the variant with "i" (17200 vs 10 400). Furthermore Encyclopaedia Britannica uses Inguri variant also. So I think that we shouldn't change the name of the article. Alæxis¿question? 19:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If Georgian sources prefer Enguri and Abkhazian prefer Ingur then I guess Inguri is a decent compromise :-P Nil Einne (talk) 06:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Enguri Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who gets the electricity?

[edit]

The article hints that the generating station and some other infrastructure lies on de-facto Abkhazian territory. But it misses any mention of who gets the electricity and how, if there is any sharing or whatever. It's a complex issue obviously, since it straddles politics and a separatist, globally almost unrecognised republic. Especially interesting with the prevalent illegal large-scale Bitcoin mining in Abkhazia in recent years and the last year's energy crisis there. Technicality nitpicker (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technicality nitpicker I've added a sentence about the historical arrangement and recent developments. Feel free to add more details. Alaexis¿question? 14:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alaexis Thanks! Looks good enough for me (but I am neither local nor much acquainted with the situation).Technicality nitpicker (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]