Talk:Indiscretion (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine)

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that a picture be added to this article.

Requested move 13 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indiscretion (Star Trek Deep Space Nine) → Indiscretion (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) — Technical, uncontroversial: standard naming form for episodes with "disambiguation" follow the title (in this case is Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with the ":"). For details, see the pages in the Category:Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episodes. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support move. Not sure how the article ended up without the colon in the first place. ONR (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Probably could have been done without a WP:RM, actually, as it is certainly technical and non-controversial. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Seems straightforward enough. And yeah, could just have been an uncontroversial technical request. V2Blast (talk) 10:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.