Talk:Idit Harel

Idit Harel was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
September 21, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notable?

The person is likely notable, but the article sounds more like an introduction for a keynote speaker at an educational conference than a NPOV wikipedia article. Youngamerican 14:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the process of working on this article. youngamerican (talk)

01:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is blatant self-promotion and should be removed, or edited down to basic information.

From Wikipedia's Vanity Guidelines:

"Vanity information is considered to be any information that was placed in any Wikipedia article that might create an apparent conflict of interest, meaning any material that presents the appearance of being intended to in any way promote the personal notoriety of the author, or one of the close family members or associates of the author."...

"Most often, vanity edits are edits about the editors themselves, their close relatives or their personal associates. While an article about a little-known company, say, should not automatically be taken as a vanity article, it is preferable for the initial author not to be an owner, employee of, or investor in the company"

I agree with the unsigned above comments and have nominated this article for deletion Appalachiangirl 16:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done most of the work on the article and I am in no way affiliated with Caperton or her company. If you think the article reads like a vanity article, feel free to edit or improve the article. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 16:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted GA

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. Unfortunately, as of September 21, 2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAC. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GA/R.

Prose: A good copy-edit is in order. I fixed some issues, but not all. Tense is an issue in some places, for example.
Point of view issues: Currently the article fails WP:NPOV, in my opinion. Many parts read like a promotional website.
Under-referenced: Currently the article is in need of additional inline citation. There are whole sections completely without reference which constitutes original research.
Images: Logos are not free use and lack fair use rationales. I question the appropriateness of even having the logos in the article at all.

Regards, Lara Love 03:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul/title change?

Did a major overhaul of this article, streamlined out unnecessary/unimportant details, uncited details, updated sources, removed self-promotional prose and neutralized POV where noted. Review and feedback welcome. Also, more current web sources show subject goes by "Idit Harel," not "Harel Caperton," following a divorce. Should the article title be changed? Oleander2323 (talk) 18:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move from "Idit Harel Caperton" to "Idit Harel" as an uncontroversial technical move. Confirmed subject does not use this previous name in contemporary online appearances.Oleander2323 (talk) 20:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Idit Harel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]