Talk:Languages of the Iberian Peninsula

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Map!!

This article desperatly needs a detailed map showing all living languages and dialects in the Iberian peninsula. Anyone has one? The Ogre 18:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lusitanian language

I have always thought that the Lusitanian language was an Indo-European language distinct from the Celtic branch. I am editing the page to reflect this. I hope no-one has any objections.

Proposal to merge Prehistoric Spain with Prehistoric Portugal & move to Prehistoric Iberia

Currently, the text of Prehistoric Spain seems really to be about prehistoric Iberia. Similarly, the text of Prehistoric Portugal seems really to be about the same thing. This would be perfectly understandable seeing as there was no Spain and no Portugal in prehistoric times. I have argued therefore that it would be best to have these articles merged under a title which indicates the geographical region rather than the modern states. I have proposed the articles be merged and moved to Prehistoric Iberia. Please come and discuss my proposal. J i m p 09:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim. If the merge goes through, what shall we do with Pre-Roman Portugal? You see, Prehistoric Spain encompasses a period that the "Portuguese" articles differentiated into Prehistoric Portugal and Pre-Roman Portugal. Should we merge them all? The Ogre 13:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the map in German is wrong

It's wrong. In Western Valencia and Southern Navarre only Castilian is spoken. --Taraborn (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cooficial languages

I tend to agree the maps are confusing - so I added another! (From the Spanish site). The section I have added could perhaps be integrated or merged into Languages of Spain but that article looked quite good anyway. Comments? Timpo (talk) 10:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. The language/province names are still in Spanish and the Fully Bilingual column looks wrong. Or the translation isn't quite right because there is no WAY that there are only 3.8% (comma needs changing to . by the way) are bilingual in Catalan and Spanish. The links to the refs are not working either. Akerbeltz (talk) 10:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, (some of?) these figures are totally wrong. It makes no sense 0.8% are other language speakers in Valencia. Sources should be verified. Jɑυмe (xarrades) 19:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's still a mess, I'm probably going to stump it to those where we have census figures. I will also simplify the categories into speakers of x and speakers of y, AFAIK we have no reliable data for how many are native bilinguals and how many aren't these days. It's usually very hard to tell anyway. Akerbeltz (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I've used the latest census figures I could find and I've nixed all bar the speakers of co-official languages colum. Castilian will be close to 100% as they're all bilingual bar some immigrant % who don't speak either but that's not really the point of the table. The strange mother tongue vs speakers was also confusing as heck (and I'm used to this kind of speak) so I've just used a simple "speakers" %, especially since not all sources go into that much detail as to specifying the point at which bilingualism was achieved. Akerbeltz (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Languages of Iberia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Languages of Iberia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]